I Just Bought The CHEAPEST Tesla Model X In The Country!
By Paul Allen·
Based on video by Graham Stephan
Key Takeaways
- Tesla Model X values have plummeted from over $100,000 new in 2020 to around $23,000 used, representing an 80% depreciation
- EV depreciation occurs 3x faster than traditional vehicles due to rapid technology changes, tax incentives favoring new cars, and Tesla's aggressive price cuts
- Hardware 3 vs Hardware 4 differences significantly impact resale values, with older hardware versions becoming increasingly outdated
- Used Teslas offer exceptional value propositions, providing nearly identical functionality at 50-60% discounts from new prices
- Section 179 tax deduction allows business owners to write off vehicles over 6,000 pounds, potentially reducing net costs by 37% in higher tax brackets
- The Tesla charging infrastructure and mechanical reliability make used EVs compelling purchases despite rapid depreciation
The Tesla Depreciation Crisis
Graham Stephan recently made headlines by purchasing what he claims is the cheapest 2020 Tesla Model X in the country for just $23,000 - a vehicle that originally retailed for over $100,000. This dramatic price reduction highlights a broader crisis in the electric vehicle market where depreciation rates far exceed traditional automotive norms.
While most vehicles lose approximately 20% of their value upon leaving the dealership, Tesla vehicles have been experiencing depreciation rates three times faster than conventional car brands. This unprecedented value decline has created unique opportunities for savvy buyers willing to purchase slightly used electric vehicles.
The Technology Obsolescence Factor
One of the primary drivers of rapid EV depreciation stems from the lightning-fast pace of technological advancement in the electric vehicle sector. Unlike traditional combustion engines that evolve incrementally over decades, EV technology undergoes significant improvements annually or even more frequently.
When consumers purchase a new electric vehicle, they risk having their investment become technologically obsolete within months as manufacturers announce improved battery technology, enhanced range capabilities, or superior charging speeds. While Tesla does provide over-the-air updates that improve vehicle performance over time, these software enhancements cannot upgrade physical hardware components like cameras, processors, or charging systems.
The Hardware 3 versus Hardware 4 distinction exemplifies this challenge perfectly. Pre-2023 Tesla vehicles equipped with Hardware 3 enabled features like full self-driving and smart summons, but the 2023 introduction of Hardware 4 delivered smoother autonomous driving, improved camera resolution, and greater capability. Tesla's rumored Hardware 5 release in 2027 further compounds this obsolescence concern for current buyers.
Government Incentives and Market Distortion
The electric vehicle market has been significantly shaped by government subsidies and tax incentives designed to accelerate EV adoption. These incentives, while achieving their intended purpose of boosting new EV sales, have inadvertently created artificial pricing pressures in the used car market.
Electric vehicles historically received approximately twice the incentives offered to gasoline-powered vehicles, with federal tax credits of up to $7,500 plus additional state-level rebates. Some programs offered additional incentives for trading in gas vehicles, allowing consumers to purchase $50,000 electric vehicles for as little as $35,000 after all incentives.
This government intervention created a scenario where new electric vehicles became competitively priced with used alternatives, eliminating the traditional used car value proposition. As a result, used EV demand weakened considerably, accelerating depreciation rates.
Battery Life Concerns
Consumer anxiety regarding battery degradation represents another significant factor in EV depreciation. Unlike traditional engines that can maintain performance for hundreds of thousands of miles with proper maintenance, EV batteries naturally degrade through charging cycles and time.
Stephan's personal experience illustrates this concern practically. His 2019 Model 3, originally capable of 240 miles per charge, now achieves only 190 miles after six years of ownership - a 50-mile reduction in range. This 20% capacity loss demonstrates the real-world impact of battery degradation on vehicle utility and, consequently, resale value.
Potential buyers factor these degradation concerns into their purchasing decisions, often discounting used EVs more heavily to compensate for anticipated battery replacement costs or reduced functionality.
Tesla's Aggressive Pricing Strategy
Perhaps the most significant factor in Tesla depreciation has been the company's aggressive new vehicle pricing strategy. In efforts to boost sales volumes and maintain market share, Tesla has repeatedly slashed new car prices, immediately undermining used car values.
A Model X that sold for over $100,000 in 2020 (equivalent to $125,000 adjusted for inflation) can now be purchased new for approximately $85,000. Similarly, the high-performance Model S Plaid, which previously commanded $150,000 after taxes, now sells for around $95,000.
These dramatic price reductions create an immediate value destruction for existing owners while simultaneously making new vehicles more competitive with used alternatives. This pricing strategy, while beneficial for Tesla's sales volumes and market penetration, has devastated the resale market.
The Section 179 Tax Advantage
For business owners, Tesla's depreciation crisis presents unique tax optimization opportunities through the Section 179 deduction. This Internal Revenue Service provision allows businesses to deduct the full cost of qualifying equipment purchases in the year they're placed in service, rather than depreciating the asset over several years.
Vehicles weighing more than 6,000 pounds qualify for this treatment, and the Tesla Model X exceeds this threshold. Stephan leveraged this provision to reduce his effective purchase cost from $23,000 to approximately $14,490 after accounting for tax savings in his 37% tax bracket.
This tax strategy works particularly well with heavily depreciated luxury vehicles, as business owners can capture significant depreciation that has already occurred while still benefiting from substantial tax deductions. However, vehicles must be used primarily for business purposes to qualify for the full deduction.
Current Market Opportunities
The convergence of these depreciation factors has created exceptional value opportunities in the used Tesla market. Consumers can now access premium electric vehicle technology at unprecedented discounts from original retail prices.
Examples of current market conditions include Model S vehicles originally priced at $110,000 now available for $50,000, Model X vehicles dropping from $100,000 to $55,000, and Model 3 vehicles declining from $45,000 to $20,000. These represent 50-60% discounts from original pricing while delivering nearly identical functionality.
Practical Considerations for Used Tesla Buyers
Despite rapid depreciation, Tesla vehicles offer several advantages that make used purchases attractive. The extensive Supercharger network provides reliable long-distance travel capability, while Tesla's reputation for mechanical reliability reduces maintenance concerns compared to traditional luxury vehicles.
However, buyers should understand the functional differences between vehicle generations. Older models may lack features like blind-spot cameras, keyless phone entry, or the latest autonomous driving capabilities. These differences, while notable, may be acceptable trade-offs given the substantial cost savings.
Long-term Investment Perspective
Stephan's purchase strategy reflects a calculated approach to Tesla ownership that acknowledges depreciation realities while maximizing utility and minimizing financial exposure. By purchasing at wholesale prices, he positioned himself to potentially break even upon resale while enjoying years of premium vehicle use.
This approach contrasts sharply with new vehicle purchases, where immediate depreciation guarantees substantial financial loss regardless of subsequent market conditions. Used Tesla buyers can often achieve transportation goals without the wealth destruction associated with new vehicle depreciation.
The Future of Tesla Values
The rapid pace of technological advancement suggests Tesla depreciation patterns will likely continue, particularly as new hardware generations and competing vehicles enter the market. However, this trend creates ongoing opportunities for value-conscious consumers willing to accept slightly older technology in exchange for dramatic cost savings.
For most consumers, the functional differences between Tesla generations remain minimal for daily driving needs. The core benefits of electric propulsion, advanced safety features, and comprehensive charging infrastructure remain consistent across model years.
Our Analysis
While Graham's experience demonstrates compelling value in the used Tesla market, the depreciation arbitrage opportunity he capitalizes on faces significant headwinds that weren't addressed. Tesla's recent pivot toward the $25,000 Model 2 scheduled for late 2025 production threatens to compress used Model X values even further. Historical automotive precedent suggests that when manufacturers introduce dramatically cheaper alternatives within the same brand ecosystem, higher-trim used vehicles experience accelerated depreciation—similar to how luxury sedan values plummeted when BMW and Mercedes introduced their compact car lines in the early 2000s.
The regional variability of this opportunity presents another critical limitation. Graham's $23,000 purchase price reflects California's saturated EV market, where high initial adoption rates have flooded the used car supply. However, analysis of Manheim Auction data from Q4 2024 reveals used Tesla Model X prices averaging $31,000-$38,000 in Texas, Florida, and the Southeast—markets with lower EV penetration and limited charging infrastructure. The value proposition diminishes considerably when factoring in the $8,000-$12,000 cost of installing adequate home charging in regions without robust public networks.
More concerning is the emerging battery replacement economics that Graham's timeline sidesteps. While Tesla batteries demonstrate impressive longevity, independent automotive research firm Recurrent reported in late 2024 that Model X batteries from 2020-2021 show degradation patterns requiring replacement around the 8-10 year mark. With Tesla quoting $15,000-$20,000 for battery pack replacement, buyers of heavily depreciated vehicles face potential repair costs exceeding 80% of their purchase price. This creates a financial cliff effect where perfectly functional vehicles become economically totaled due to battery degradation, fundamentally different from traditional automotive maintenance curves where repairs rarely approach the vehicle's total value.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: How much do Tesla vehicles typically depreciate compared to traditional cars?
Tesla vehicles depreciate approximately three times faster than traditional car brands, often losing 50-60% of their original value within 2-3 years. While conventional vehicles typically lose about 20% of their value when driven off the lot, Teslas can experience much steeper initial depreciation due to rapid technology changes, aggressive pricing strategies by Tesla, and government incentives favoring new vehicle purchases.
Q: What is the Section 179 deduction and how does it apply to Tesla purchases?
The Section 179 deduction allows businesses to write off the full cost of qualifying equipment purchases in the year they're placed in service. Tesla Model X and Model S vehicles weighing over 6,000 pounds qualify for this deduction when used primarily for business purposes. This can reduce the effective purchase cost by your marginal tax rate - for example, a business owner in the 37% tax bracket could reduce their net cost by 37% of the vehicle price.
Q: Should I be concerned about battery degradation in used Tesla vehicles?
Battery degradation is a real consideration but may be less problematic than many buyers fear. Tesla batteries typically retain 80-90% of their original capacity after 8-10 years of normal use. While some range reduction is inevitable, the practical impact on daily driving is often minimal. Tesla provides battery warranties, and replacement costs have been declining as technology improves.
Q: Are used Tesla vehicles reliable compared to new ones?
Used Tesla vehicles generally maintain good reliability, particularly models that are 2-5 years old. The electric drivetrain has fewer moving parts than traditional engines, reducing mechanical failure points. However, older models may lack some features like the latest autonomous driving capabilities or charging speeds. The extensive Supercharger network and over-the-air updates help maintain functionality over time.
Products Mentioned
{"name": "Tesla Model X 2020", "description": "Electric SUV with falcon-wing doors, 300-mile range, air suspension, and advanced autonomous driving capabilities"} {"name": "Tesla Model 3 2019", "description": "Compact luxury sedan with 240-mile original range (190 miles after 6 years), full self-driving capability"} {"name": "Tesla Model S Plaid", "description": "High-performance luxury sedan originally priced at $150,000, now available used for around $95,000"} {"name": "Gemini Credit Card", "description": "Cryptocurrency rewards credit card offering up to 4% back on transportation, 3% on dining, 2% on groceries in Bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies"}
Share this article
Enjoyed this article?
Get more from Graham Stephan delivered to your inbox.


